Margaret Hoover

Those who accuse the once libertarian Bill Maher of becoming too much of a liberal apologist might want to clean their ears. Maher made a Juan Williams-esque confession on his program when he apprehensively noted that Mohammed has just become the most popular baby name in Britain. “Am I a racist to feel alarmed by that?” Maher asked his panel. “Because I am. And it’s not because of the race, it’s because of the religion. I don’t have to apologize, do I, for not wanting the Western world to be taken over by Islam in 300 years?”

His normally boisterous crowd fell silent as the panel responded to Maher’s admission.

“If you’re with NPR,” the conservative Margaret Hoover chimed, “You’d be fired.”

“It’s worse,” Lawrence O’Donnell told Maher. “It’s way worse than what Juan Williams said.” Hoover seemed to agree with this sentiment.

Reihan Salam, a conservative analyst with a Muslim name, also seemed irked by Maher’s comments, noting that he “has some uncles named Mohammed” that are “pretty decent guys.”

Of course, it’s not the name that Maher fears, but the religion. (Any of them, in fact — Maher’s qualms with religion of any sort, Islam or not, are long-standing and well-documented.) Hoover further stoked Maher by claiming that the U.K is saddled with a “far bigger problem” than baby names: Sharia Law, which she said is creeping into England.

“Then I’m right,” Maher said, taking her for her word. “I should be alarmed. And I don’t apologize for it.”

And we believe him there. After all, this is the same man who got his previous show Politically Incorrect cancelled when he asserted that the 9/11 attackers were “not cowardly.”

Read more »

Gawker Christine O Donnell

The Christine O'Donnell campaign has taken to Facebook to address a highly criticized anonymous account of a late-night encounter involving the Tea Party-backed Republican Senate candidate published in Gawker Thursday.

In the post, O'Donnell communications director Doug Sachtleben denounces the piece as sexist "slander" that is indicative of the shallow manner in which the press has chosen to cover female candidates. He also manages to get in a shot at her Democratic opponent, Chris Coons, seemingly implying that he condoned the article.

"This story is just another example of the sexism and slander that female candidates are forced to deal with. From Secretary Clinton, to Governor Palin, to soon-to-be Governor Haley, Christine's political opponents have been willing to engage in appalling and baseless attacks -- all with the aim of distracting the press from covering the real issues in this race. Even the National Organization for Women gets it, but Christine's opponent disturbingly does not. As Chris Coons said on September 16th he would not condone personal attacks against Christine. Classless Coons goons have proven yet again to have no sense of common decency or common sense with their desperate attacks to get another rubber stamp for the Obama-Pelosi-Reid agenda. Such attacks are truly shameful, but they will not distract us from making our case to Delaware voters -- and keeping the focus on Chris Coons' record of higher taxes, increased spending, and as he has done again here, breaking his promises to the voters."
The rest of the post then aggregates various critical reactions around the web, from sources as disparate as NOW and Michelle Malkin.

Gawker, which told the Upshot on Thursday that it paid in the "low four figures" for the story, defended its editorial decision, claiming that the author, as well as his controversial account of that Halloween night, had been appropriately fact-checked.

"From an editorial standpoint, it was compelling to hear it from his own words," Gawker editor Remy Stern told the Upshot. "[I]t's a good story and that's why we did it."

A similar, though not so high-profile media firestorm was ignited earlier this month when Democratic Virginia congressional candidate Krystal Ball was put in the spotlight over pictures that were posted from a racy Christmas party years ago.

In a column she wrote for HuffPost, she came to this sober conclusion:

Society has to accept that women of my generation have sexual lives that are going to leak into the public sphere. Sooner or later, this is a reality that has to be faced, or many young women in my generation will not be able to run for office.

Read more »